(egotistical bastard) (watashinokokoro) wrote in doctorwho,
(egotistical bastard)

On The Angels Take Manhattan

A (rather late) realization....

Wait a second. The problem is that the TARDIS can't go back to New York City in 1940 anymore, right? So why doesn't River go bring them back with her vortex manipulator? Sure, it's a bumpy ride, but Ten did it back when the Master took the TARDIS...

Alternatively, couldn't they just leave Manhattan then leave the Doctor a sign wherever they end up?

I don't know, did I miss something?

But seriously. I know it's a bit late for me to realize these things, but the end of the Angels Take Manhattan just keeps annoying me... it just felt like Moffat thought "Eh, they've been there too long, time to get rid of 'em... and make it look as touching and permanent as possible" and just threw something together.
Tags: discussion
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded